As the "problem-solving_experiment" was part of projects that was around extreme secrecy and the results on the communists eyes (who run then and up to now run big part of the world public opinion and norms) was definitely big no-no for public then do not expect after 50 years to find too many easy leads to it, there might be re-written, distorted and cut links, but the ones who know what LSD is, they know what to search for.
And this is what we are searching for.
This blog is not what it should be, what it could be, but at least i can collect some links in here and if You want, You can send You links here related to the materials we are searching ( study mentioned in CNN video ), so another persons, who can, will be able to use these materials for Wikipedia links.
links used in Article before:
https://vastased.blogspot.com/p/lingid-korrastuseks.html
This blog, is for a reason to restore novel Wikipedia article written by Custoo : http://web.archive.org/web/20211022161659/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelics_in_problem-solving_experiment
that Alexbrn (Alex Brown) by someones order destroyed into the state of:
http://web.archive.org/web/20211213212509/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelics_in_problem-solving_experiment
http://web.archive.org/web/20211213155205/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelics_in_problem-solving_experiment
it is most likely not just Alex fault, as if not him, someone else would have got that "order". There is many human-tools used that kind of censor and re-writing of history.
But just to be sure we do conduct small lookup for this ISO certified vandal "Alex Brown", just to give idea on what level these kind of people work, and their level is pretty high. (not in a good way)
About Vandals:
(Vandals was one of the cultural savage killer forces, contributed to Soviet terror later in history, that was active eliminating native and shamanic cultures, on current time and age they usually work in offices tie around a neck or in some academic high positions where they can serve their master best)
The experiment displayed in CNN:
Further proof of Alex vandal behavior:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Psychedelics_in_problem-solving_experiment
As google already have deleted references to article that popped up before, then it seems there is as usually, bigger thing going on,
and many other articles, and data are in danger (the last massive data elimination they also did before new year, Yahoo-archive, google plus and many other services and pages, databases )
Before search on it, the Wiki page come first:
First they destroy the article and then:
http://web.archive.org/web/20211213155205/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelics_in_problem-solving_experiment
Custoo first answer in Wikipedia:
Discussion about proposed deletion
Alexbrn I praise some of the recent revisions you have made to this article. I wrote this article almost ten years ago and maybe the article shouldn't be as detailed as I wrote it back then since the results and methodology of the experiment can truly be criticised from todays perspective and scientific standards. Ultimately it is just a single study and a single study can never prove anything. Nevertheless Wikipedia does include articles about single studies. There are few other articles on Wikipedia about historical experiments done with psychedelics. These experiments don't hold up to todays standards but so far they have still been included in Wikipedia and I assume it is mostly for historical value and not because of their scientific merits. This is why I also doubt it is reasonable to hold them up for the criteria of MEDRS sourcing as biomedical information. I don't think a historical article (that this article mostly is after your revisions) is percieved to make much claims about possible effects of psychedelics so that it would need MEDRS sourcing. I think I used all the available sources when I wrote this article so I don't think more sources from the sixties about this study will suddenly appear. There is a freshly published article about the same question wheter a psychedelic drug might effect creative process but of course that article is not about this particular study. Perhaps it could be written in this article the same way as is done with other historical studies like Concord Prison Experiment and Marsh Chapel Experiment that have inspired more contemporary studies. The authors of the recent study conclude "Findings add some support to historical claims that psychedelics can influence aspects of the creative process, potentially indicating them as a tool to investigate creativity and subsequent underlying neural mechanisms." I do regret that you deleted the criticism section which I think should be reverted even though it was not based on a peer reviewed article. The criticism would have also helped to dispute any claims this historical study could try to make about possible effects of psychedelics and in so doing put it in proper perspective as a historical study and not claim about biomedical information. One could ask why then include the article at all. My aswer is that for the same reason Wikipedia includes article Retracted article on dopaminergic neurotoxicity of MDMA. To correct possible misinformation from a single study. I guess in this sense I'm more in overall support of inclusionism than deletionism. Deleting the article from Wikipedia won't remove it from the folk lore of drugs but it will make sure that people won't be as likely to come across the criticism about it nor the contemporary research to replace the old views. I object deletion and instead propose (1) reverting the deletion of the criticism chapter and (2) adding of contemporary follow-up to make this article more balanced and acceptable. Because of this I will remove PROD process and if anyone disagrees they can invoke AfD process and join the discussion.--Custoo (talk) 20:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please share Your links Related to any findings about Psychedelics_in_problem-solving_experiment and related study's.